<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Buildr &#8211; maven drop-in Ersatz?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everflux.de/buildr-maven-drop-in-ersatz-265/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everflux.de/buildr-maven-drop-in-ersatz-265/</link>
	<description>Java, Ubuntu - und das Leben.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>Von: Stefan Reuter</title>
		<link>http://everflux.de/buildr-maven-drop-in-ersatz-265/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Reuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everflux.de/buildr-maven-drop-in-ersatz-265/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Maven vs Buildr...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Maven&#039;s big advantage over ant is a declarative approach describing projects instead of describing (or programming) the build process. Buildr drops the Maven POM (project object model) and returns to coding the build process - this time not in XML as...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maven vs Buildr&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Maven&#8217;s big advantage over ant is a declarative approach describing projects instead of describing (or programming) the build process. Buildr drops the Maven POM (project object model) and returns to coding the build process &#8211; this time not in XML as&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

